|
Menu
|
|
Authors
Call for Papers Submit Research Paper Submission Guidelines Review Process Scirj Indexing APC Editors Editorial Board Publication Ethics Publications Research Journal Special Issue Thesis Monograph Resources RSS & Feeds Subscribe
Scirj, Volume XIII [2025]
December Issue November Issue October Issue September Issue August Issue July Issue June Issue May Issue April Issue March Issue February Issue January Issue |
Scirj Volume IV, Issue IV, April 2016 Edition ISSN: 2201-2796 Dr. A. Muhammad Asrun Abstract: It is undeniable that the presence of the non-career justices has been filled with intellectual treasures in the decisions of the Supreme Court. Their capabilities of legal knowledge have strengthened Supreme Court verdicts in the past. That's one side of the presence of the non-career justices. However, the situation today has changed over the presence of the non-career justices. The candidate of non-career justices from universities have been questioned their working capability as well as their understanding on procedural law. Justices recruited from universities admitted that they need time to learn to read files quickly and their practice in making a decision. The exercise takes about three to six months. The problem really should not be happening when the non-career justices had legal practice experiences such as a lawyer or as a legal consultant at a law firm. Reference this Paper: The Implementation of Non-Career Justice Recruitment for the Supreme Court in Indonesia by Dr. A. Muhammad Asrun published at: "Scientific Research Journal (Scirj), Volume IV, Issue IV, April 2016 Edition, Page 38-43 ". Search Terms: Non-career justice, working capabilities, procedural law, Supreme Court [Read Research Paper] [Full Screen] |